Können grüne Tests lügen | Siegfried Brueckner
Siegfried Brueckner makes “Exit-Code 0” the incriminating detail: scripts swallowed runtime errors and still reported success, explaining exactly how a quality gate becomes decoration. His rule, “Ich glaube keinem Testlauf mehr, den ich nicht mindestens einmal habe kontrolliert scheitern sehen,” demands demonstrated failure detection rather than another reassuring test count—a harder standard to satisfy. He also subjects his remedy to that standard: “Kostete zwei volle Arbeitstage” leads not to a mutation-testing victory lap, but to the admission that source inspection found the worst weakness. That keeps the account from becoming a tool pitch. And “gegenseitiges Schulterklopfen zweier Modelle” gives the technical problem a precise comic image: two models congratulating each other, with correctness conspicuously absent from the ceremony.
The post contains phrases like 'Mein Fazit aus der Werkstatt' that hint at a humble reflection but lacks overt self-deprecation.
While the author references personal experience, there is minimal name-dropping or reliance on credentials.
'Ein grüner Haken ist kein Beweis für Korrektheit' serves as a somewhat generic insight without substantial follow-through.
The post maintains consistency in its critique of testing practices and does not contradict itself.
'Ich habe die Prüfroutinen selbst auf die Werkbank gelegt' implies a personal methodology but does not aggressively promote the author.
The language remains relatively fresh; however, phrases like 'einfache Mittel bleiben die härtesten' show some cliché usage.
Scores under 34 are rare. Put this on your site, newsletter, or next post.